2004 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (120 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2010 Volvo C30. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 2010 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 245 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (270 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer. (176 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Lancer | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
Model | Lancer | C30 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 270 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |