2004 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 2011 Renault Clio
To start off, 2011 Renault Clio is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2011 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 2011 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (177 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Lancer | 2011 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Lancer | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1834 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 177 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2480 mm |