2004 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 2013 Lincoln Navigator
To start off, 2013 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Lincoln Navigator (306 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lincoln Navigator should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lincoln Navigator weights approximately 1517 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Lincoln Navigator is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Lincoln Navigator will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lincoln Navigator (495 Nm) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer. (176 Nm). This means 2013 Lincoln Navigator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer | 2013 Lincoln Navigator | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Lincoln |
| Model | Lancer | Navigator |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 306 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 495 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 105 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 2723 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5293 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2332 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1988 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3023 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 6.7 L/100km | 11.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 8.4 L/100km | 16.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 106 L |
