2004 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 2010 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Charger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Charger weights approximately 1006 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Dodge Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 2004 Mitsubishi Minica has manual transmission. 2004 Mitsubishi Minica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Minica | 2010 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Dodge |
Model | Minica | Charger |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 250 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1716 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 5083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1478 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3048 mm |