2004 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 2011 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2011 Ford C-Max is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford C-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford C-Max weights approximately 840 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Ford C-Max. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mitsubishi Minica | 2011 Ford C-Max | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
| Model | Minica | C-Max |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 95 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1828 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2788 mm |
