2004 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 4,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS weights approximately 1180 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS has automatic transmission and 2004 Mitsubishi Minica has manual transmission. 2004 Mitsubishi Minica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Minica | 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Minica | CLS |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 4663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 402 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 7-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1417 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2875 mm |