2004 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 770 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Minica | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | Minica | Matrix |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 156 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4365 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2600 mm |