2004 Mitsubishi Montero vs. 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Montero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Montero would be higher. At 3,835 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Montero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Montero (215 HP) has 28 more horse power than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (187 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Montero should accelerate faster than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Montero (336 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (320 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Montero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Montero | 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Jeep |
Model | Montero | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3835 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 336 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1958 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1755 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 80 L |