2004 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 1968 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Toyota Corolla. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Toyota Corolla would be higher. At 2,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (162 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1968 Toyota Corolla. (59 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1968 Toyota Corolla. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 770 kg more than 1968 Toyota Corolla. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (215 Nm) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Toyota Corolla. (77 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Toyota Corolla.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | 1968 Toyota Corolla | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | Outlander | Corolla |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2343 cc | 1077 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 162 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 215 Nm | 77 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 61 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 61 L |
