2004 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 1969 Renault 12
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Renault 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Renault 12 would be higher. At 2,374 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1969 Renault 12. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1969 Renault 12. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 570 kg more than 1969 Renault 12. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (220 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Renault 12. (98 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Renault 12.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | 1969 Renault 12 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Outlander | 12 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2374 cc | 1288 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 98 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 60 L |