2004 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 1976 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Ford Falcon (256 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Ford Falcon weights approximately 115 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Ford Falcon (491 Nm) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (220 Nm). This means 1976 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | 1976 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Outlander | Falcon |
Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2374 cc | 5763 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 491 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2830 mm |