2004 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (162 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Celica. (115 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 305 kg more than 1982 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (215 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Celica. (172 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | Outlander | Celica |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2343 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 162 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 215 Nm | 172 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 75 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1165 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2620 mm |
