2004 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 1983 Renault Rodeo
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Renault Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Renault Rodeo would be higher. At 2,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (162 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1983 Renault Rodeo. (34 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1983 Renault Rodeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 750 kg more than 1983 Renault Rodeo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (215 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Renault Rodeo. (75 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Renault Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | 1983 Renault Rodeo | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Outlander | Rodeo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2343 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 162 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 215 Nm | 75 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 72 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 34 L |