2004 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (162 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (124 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 260 kg more than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (215 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (203 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Outlander | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2343 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 162 HP | 124 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Torque | 215 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2640 mm |
