2004 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 1994 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,963 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Jeep Grand Cherokee (190 HP) has 28 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (162 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 178 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Jeep Grand Cherokee (305 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (215 Nm). This means 1994 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | 1994 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Jeep |
| Model | Outlander | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1994 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2343 cc | 3963 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 162 HP | 190 HP |
| Torque | 215 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 98.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 86.6 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1648 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 87 L |
