2004 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 2010 Lincoln MKT
To start off, 2010 Lincoln MKT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Lincoln MKT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lincoln MKT (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lincoln MKT should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lincoln MKT weights approximately 571 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Lincoln MKT (362 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (220 Nm). This means 2010 Lincoln MKT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | 2010 Lincoln MKT | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Lincoln |
Model | Outlander | MKT |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2374 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 362 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 2041 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5273 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2995 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 70 L |