2004 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (180 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (162 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 243 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (215 Nm). This means 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Chevrolet |
Model | Outlander | Equinox |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2343 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 162 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 215 Nm | 233 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 98 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1713 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4771 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2857 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 71 L |