2004 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 2013 Fiat 500
To start off, 2013 Fiat 500 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander would be higher. At 2,374 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2013 Fiat 500. (101 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 2013 Fiat 500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 364 kg more than 2013 Fiat 500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (220 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Fiat 500. (133 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Fiat 500.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | 2013 Fiat 500 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Fiat |
| Model | Outlander | 500 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2374 cc | 1368 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 220 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 84 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1106 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3547 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1627 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2300 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 40 L |
