2004 Mitsubishi Pajero vs. 2010 Peugeot 207

To start off, 2010 Peugeot 207 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Pajero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Pajero would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Pajero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Pajero (176 HP) has 24 more horse power than 2010 Peugeot 207. (152 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Pajero should accelerate faster than 2010 Peugeot 207.

Because 2004 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Peugeot 207. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Mitsubishi Pajero 2010 Peugeot 207
Make Mitsubishi Peugeot
Model Pajero 207
Year Released 2004 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2972 cc 1600 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 176 HP 152 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Length 4550 mm 4044 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1972 mm
Vehicle Height 1740 mm 1397 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]