2004 Nissan 350Z vs. 1972 Reliant Rebel
To start off, 2004 Nissan 350Z is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Reliant Rebel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Reliant Rebel would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan 350Z (287 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 256 more horse power than 1972 Reliant Rebel. (31 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1972 Reliant Rebel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan 350Z weights approximately 885 kg more than 1972 Reliant Rebel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan 350Z (372 Nm) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Reliant Rebel. (53 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Reliant Rebel.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan 350Z | 1972 Reliant Rebel | |
Make | Nissan | Reliant |
Model | 350Z | Rebel |
Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3507 cc | 701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 287 HP | 31 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 372 Nm | 53 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 3510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2270 mm |