2004 Nissan 350Z vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 2004 Nissan 350Z is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan 350Z (287 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan 350Z (372 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (157 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan 350Z | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | 350Z | 140 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3507 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 287 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 372 Nm | 157 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2620 mm |