2004 Nissan 350Z vs. 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2004 Nissan 350Z is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 694 kg more than 2004 Nissan 350Z.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Nissan 350Z | 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Nissan | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | 350Z | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3507 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 287 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 2154 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3060 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 107 L |
