2004 Nissan 350Z vs. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2004 Nissan 350Z is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,343 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan 350Z (287 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (120 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 27 kg more than 2004 Nissan 350Z.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan 350Z (372 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (305 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan 350Z | 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Nissan | Oldsmobile |
Model | 350Z | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3490 cc | 4343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 287 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 372 Nm | 305 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1459 kg | 1486 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2750 mm |