2004 Nissan Altima vs. 1972 Datsun 240Z
To start off, 2004 Nissan Altima is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 2,505 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Altima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Altima (175 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1972 Datsun 240Z. (151 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Altima should accelerate faster than 1972 Datsun 240Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Altima weights approximately 293 kg more than 1972 Datsun 240Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Datsun 240Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Datsun 240Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Altima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Altima (244 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Datsun 240Z. (198 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Altima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Datsun 240Z.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Nissan Altima | 1972 Datsun 240Z | |
| Make | Nissan | Datsun |
| Model | Altima | 240Z |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2505 cc | 2393 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 151 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 73.7 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1361 kg | 1068 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2300 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 11 L/100km |
