2004 Nissan Altima vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Altima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Altima would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 1268 kg more than 2004 Nissan Altima.
Because 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Altima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm) has 476 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan Altima. (244 Nm). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan Altima.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Altima | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Nissan | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Altima | Phantom |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5350 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 720 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1361 kg | 2629 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5612 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1987 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1598 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3320 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.8 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.2 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 100 L |