2004 Nissan Armada vs. 1949 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 268 more horse power than 1949 Triumph Mayflower. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1949 Triumph Mayflower. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1324 kg more than 1949 Triumph Mayflower. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 443 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Triumph Mayflower. (79 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Triumph Mayflower.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 1949 Triumph Mayflower | |
Make | Nissan | Triumph |
Model | Armada | Mayflower |
Year Released | 2004 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 79 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98.1 mm | 63 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 6.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2110 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 45 L |