2004 Nissan Armada vs. 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 974 kg more than 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Nissan | Studebaker |
Model | Armada | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 0 HP |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2980 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 68 L |