2004 Nissan Armada vs. 1965 Toyota Crown
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP) has 225 more horse power than 1965 Toyota Crown. (80 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1965 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1019 kg more than 1965 Toyota Crown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 376 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Toyota Crown. (146 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Nissan Armada | 1965 Toyota Crown | |
| Make | Nissan | Toyota |
| Model | Armada | Crown |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1897 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 80 HP |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 98.1 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 85 mm |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1255 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 75 L |
