2004 Nissan Armada vs. 1965 Toyota Sport 800
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Toyota Sport 800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Toyota Sport 800 would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 257 more horse power than 1965 Toyota Sport 800. (48 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1965 Toyota Sport 800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1693 kg more than 1965 Toyota Sport 800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 450 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Toyota Sport 800. (72 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Toyota Sport 800.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 1965 Toyota Sport 800 | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Armada | Sport 800 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5555 cc | 790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 48 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 72 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 72.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 581 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 3590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 30 L |