2004 Nissan Armada vs. 1977 Datsun 260Z
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Datsun 260Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Datsun 260Z would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1977 Datsun 260Z. (163 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1977 Datsun 260Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1074 kg more than 1977 Datsun 260Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 309 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Datsun 260Z. (213 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Datsun 260Z.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 1977 Datsun 260Z | |
Make | Nissan | Datsun |
Model | Armada | 260Z |
Year Released | 2004 | 1977 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 2565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 213 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98.1 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2581 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 12 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 60 L |