2004 Nissan Armada vs. 1978 Datsun 280Z
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Datsun 280Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Datsun 280Z would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1978 Datsun 280Z. (150 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1978 Datsun 280Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 970 kg more than 1978 Datsun 280Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Datsun 280Z. (221 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Datsun 280Z.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 1978 Datsun 280Z | |
Make | Nissan | Datsun |
Model | Armada | 280Z |
Year Released | 2004 | 1978 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5555 cc | 2753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 221 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1304 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4399 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1631 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2304 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 60 L |