2004 Nissan Armada vs. 1980 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1980 Holden Commodore. (111 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1980 Holden Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1014 kg more than 1980 Holden Commodore. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 291 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Holden Commodore. (231 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Nissan Armada | 1980 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Nissan | Holden |
| Model | Armada | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5556 cc | 3298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 111 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 231 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1260 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2670 mm |
