2004 Nissan Armada vs. 1981 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1981 Toyota Celica. (114 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1981 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 974 kg more than 1981 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 325 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Toyota Celica. (197 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 1981 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Armada | Celica |
Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5555 cc | 2759 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 197 Nm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 61 L |