2004 Nissan Armada vs. 1982 Bitter SC
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bitter SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bitter SC would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1982 Bitter SC. (178 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1982 Bitter SC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 924 kg more than 1982 Bitter SC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 274 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Bitter SC. (248 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Bitter SC.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Nissan Armada | 1982 Bitter SC | |
| Make | Nissan | Bitter |
| Model | Armada | SC |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5556 cc | 2969 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 178 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 248 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 75 L |
