2004 Nissan Armada vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Celica. (115 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1109 kg more than 1982 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 350 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Celica. (172 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Nissan Armada | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Nissan | Toyota |
| Model | Armada | Celica |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 172 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 98.1 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 75 mm |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1165 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2620 mm |
