2004 Nissan Armada vs. 1983 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 1983 Mitsubishi Colt. (70 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1983 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1350 kg more than 1983 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 420 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mitsubishi Colt. (102 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 1983 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Nissan | Mitsubishi |
Model | Armada | Colt |
Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5555 cc | 1439 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 102 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 924 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2390 mm |