2004 Nissan Armada vs. 1992 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1992 Ford Tempo. (129 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1079 kg more than 1992 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 318 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Tempo. (204 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Nissan Armada | 1992 Ford Tempo | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | Armada | Tempo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5556 cc | 2986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 204 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2540 mm |
