2004 Nissan Armada vs. 1992 Volvo 460
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Volvo 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Volvo 460 would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1992 Volvo 460. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1992 Volvo 460. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1224 kg more than 1992 Volvo 460. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 347 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Volvo 460. (175 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Volvo 460.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 1992 Volvo 460 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Armada | 460 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1721 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 175 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 60 L |