2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Tundra. (242 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Tundra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 324 kg more than 2000 Toyota Tundra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Tundra. (426 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Tundra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Nissan Armada | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Nissan | Toyota |
| Model | Armada | Tundra |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5556 cc | 4663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 242 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 426 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 98.1 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 84 mm |
| Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 3270 mm |
