2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2001 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2001 Toyota Tundra. (245 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota Tundra.
Because 2004 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Toyota Tundra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota Tundra. (427 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota Tundra.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 2001 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Armada | Tundra |
Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5555 cc | 4700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 427 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2010 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 45 L |