2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2002 Opel Omega
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Opel Omega would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 2002 Opel Omega. (142 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2002 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 609 kg more than 2002 Opel Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 313 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Opel Omega. (209 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Nissan Armada | 2002 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Nissan | Opel |
| Model | Armada | Omega |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 5555 cc | 2197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 142 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 209 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 98 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 94.6 mm |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1665 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2740 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 75 L |
