2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2002 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 2002 Toyota Celica. (129 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2002 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1276 kg more than 2002 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 352 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Toyota Celica. (170 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 2002 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Armada | Celica |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5555 cc | 1832 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 170 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 91.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2416 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2010 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 55 L |