2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2004 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, both 2004 Nissan Armada and 2004 Volkswagen Polo were released in the same year (2004). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 231 more horse power than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1109 kg more than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 327 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. (195 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 2004 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Nissan | Volkswagen |
Model | Armada | Polo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5555 cc | 1422 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 195 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 19.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 4.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 45 L |