2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2005 Kia Shuma II
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Shuma II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 274 kg more than 2005 Kia Shuma II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 365 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (157 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Shuma II.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 2005 Kia Shuma II | |
Make | Nissan | Kia |
Model | Armada | Shuma II |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 157 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98.1 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 50 L |