2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2005 Toyota Aygo
To start off, 2005 Toyota Aygo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP) has 252 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Aygo. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Aygo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1384 kg more than 2005 Toyota Aygo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 390 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Aygo. (132 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Aygo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 2005 Toyota Aygo | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Armada | Aygo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 522 Nm | 132 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98.1 mm | 73.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 81.5 mm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 3405 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1615 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 3.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 5.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 4.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 35 L |