2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2005 Toyota RunX
To start off, 2005 Toyota RunX is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 2005 Toyota RunX. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota RunX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1152 kg more than 2005 Toyota RunX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 375 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota RunX. (147 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota RunX.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 2005 Toyota RunX | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Armada | RunX |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 147 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98.1 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 81.5 mm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1122 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 60 L |