2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2009 Toyota Venza
To start off, 2009 Toyota Venza is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2009 Toyota Venza. (269 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2009 Toyota Venza.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Toyota Venza. (334 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Toyota Venza.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 2009 Toyota Venza | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Armada | Venza |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 3456 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 334 Nm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 67 L |