2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2009 Volvo V70
To start off, 2009 Volvo V70 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2009 Volvo V70. (235 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2009 Volvo V70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 676 kg more than 2009 Volvo V70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo V70. (320 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo V70.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 2009 Volvo V70 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Armada | V70 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5555 cc | 3192 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 320 Nm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1598 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 70 L |