2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2010 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Express is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2010 Chevrolet Express. (195 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2010 Chevrolet Express. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 54 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet Express. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chevrolet Express. (352 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chevrolet Express.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 2010 Chevrolet Express | |
Make | Nissan | Chevrolet |
Model | Armada | Express |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 4300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 352 Nm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 2220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 5692 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 2073 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 3429 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 117 L |