2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2010 Dodge Avenger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Avenger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 2010 Dodge Avenger. (173 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2010 Dodge Avenger.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Dodge Avenger. (225 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Dodge Avenger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Nissan Armada | 2010 Dodge Avenger | |
| Make | Nissan | Dodge |
| Model | Armada | Avenger |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5556 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 225 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4849 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1824 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1496 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2766 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 64 L |
